What is Maker (MKR)?
Maker is the protocol behind DAI — the cryptocurrency world's largest decentralized stablecoin. Lock up ETH, get DAI. Pay a stability fee, MKR gets burned. Own MKR, govern the whole thing. It's been live since 2017 and manages billions in collateral without a single company in control.
Updated:
Maker (MKR) at a Glance
- ✅Governs MakerDAO — the protocol that issues DAI, the largest decentralized stablecoin with $5B+ in circulation
- ✅Founded by Rune Christensen (Copenhagen) — one of the oldest running DeFi protocols, live since December 2017
- ✅~900K MKR total supply — deflationary because stability fees are used to buy and burn MKR continuously
- ✅DAI is created by locking overcollateralized crypto in Maker Vaults — no bank, no backing company
- ✅Rebranded to Sky Protocol in 2024 — MKR → SKY conversion optional, MKR continues to trade
- ✅All-time high: $6,339 (April 2021) — among the most expensive individual tokens in DeFi history
MKR Price Statistics
| All-Time High | $6,339 (April 2021) |
| All-Time Low | $168 (December 2019) |
| Launch Date | December 2017 (MCD: November 2019) |
| Circulating Supply | ~900,000 MKR (deflationary) |
| Blockchain | Ethereum (ERC-20) |
| Peak Market Cap | ~$5.5B (April 2021) |
Programming Money: The MakerDAO Protocol
In 2017, most DeFi didn't exist. There were no lending protocols, no DEXes, and no stablecoins you could use on-chain without trusting a company. Rune Christensen, a Danish entrepreneur, wanted to change that. The idea: create a stablecoin backed entirely by crypto — no banks, no custodians, no counterparty risk.
MakerDAO launched in December 2017 with Single-Collateral DAI (SAI), backed only by ETH. In November 2019, it upgraded to Multi-Collateral DAI, accepting multiple asset types. Since then, over $8 billion in DAI has been created at peak by users locking up collateral in Maker Vaults. The protocol has processed hundreds of millions in stability fees — fees that flow directly back to MKR holders via token burns.
Think of Maker as a decentralized central bank. MKR holders are the shareholders and policymakers. They vote on interest rates (stability fees), which collateral types are acceptable, and risk parameters. When the system makes money, MKR supply shrinks. When the system needs a bailout, MKR is minted and sold. This alignment is intentional — good governance profits holders, bad risk management dilutes them.
MakerDAO Key Facts
How to Create DAI With a Maker Vault
Deposit Collateral Into a Vault
Go to the Maker interface and deposit ETH (or wBTC, stETH, or other approved assets) into a Maker Vault smart contract. Your collateral is now locked — the system knows you deposited it and will track its value in real time.
Borrow DAI Against It
You can borrow DAI up to a maximum percentage of your collateral value. For ETH vaults with a 150% minimum collateral ratio, $3,000 in ETH lets you borrow up to $2,000 in DAI. The newly borrowed DAI is freshly minted — that's how new DAI enters circulation.
Use DAI — Then Repay to Unlock Collateral
Use your DAI however you want: trade it, earn yield, pay for things on-chain. When you want your collateral back, repay the DAI plus an annual stability fee (set by governance). The repaid DAI is burned, reducing supply. Your collateral is unlocked and returned to you.
MKR Burns From Your Fees
The stability fee you paid in DAI goes to the Maker protocol. The protocol uses that DAI to buy MKR from the market, then destroys it. This is automatic and happens continuously across all active vaults. More vault activity = more MKR burning = fewer MKR in existence = value accrual to MKR holders.
MKR Tokenomics: Deflationary by Design
MKR has a unique economic model. Unlike most governance tokens that simply give voting rights, MKR has a direct financial connection to protocol performance:
The backstop mechanism: If a vault is liquidated and there's still bad debt (the collateral wasn't enough), the Maker protocol raises money by minting new MKR and auctioning it for DAI. This self-insures the system using MKR holders as the backstop — governance decisions that cause bad debt are punished by MKR dilution. Good governance is rewarded with buyback-and-burn.
MakerDAO History
Rune Christensen publishes the original concept for a decentralized stablecoin on the Ethereum network. He begins building the Maker Foundation and protocol architecture years before launch.
Single-Collateral DAI (called SAI) launches in December. Only ETH can be used as collateral. The protocol works — DAI holds its $1 peg through the 2018 ETH crash (ETH lost 94% of its value), proving the design. MKR reaches ~$2,000 briefly.
Multi-Collateral DAI launches in November — now accepting wBTC, USDC, BAT, and more. The DAI Savings Rate is introduced. Maker becomes the backbone of DeFi. A16z invests $15M in the Maker Foundation.
Black Thursday (March 12, 2020) — ETH crashes 50% in 24 hours. Maker liquidations fail due to gas price spike, creating $5.4M in bad debt. Emergency governance response includes minting and auctioning new MKR, covering all losses. DAI peg recovers. MakerDAO adds USDC as collateral — a controversial decision for a "decentralized" protocol.
MKR reaches $6,339 (April 2021) as DeFi TVL hits all-time highs. DAI supply peaks at $8B+. Maker begins the Endgame plan — a long-term restructuring toward full decentralization through MetaDAOs. DSR attracts billions in deposits.
Maker begins investing in Real-World Assets (RWA) — including US Treasury bills — earning yield that funds protocol expenses and the DSR. In 2024, the Sky Protocol rebrand launches: MKR converts optionally to SKY (1:24,000), DAI optionally to USDS. Both original tokens continue trading.
DAI vs Other Stablecoins
Not all stablecoins are equal. The differences between DAI, USDC, USDT, and newer stablecoins like FRAX come down to who's in control, what backs the peg, and whether regulation can touch them. Here's a direct comparison:
| Stablecoin | Issuer | Backing | Censorship resistant? | KYC required? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAI | MakerDAO (decentralized) | ETH, USDC, RWA, other DeFi collateral | Partially (USDC exposure is a risk) | No |
| USDC | Circle (US company) | USD in bank accounts | No — blacklist function exists | Yes (regulated issuer) |
| USDT | Tether Limited | Cash equivalents, commercial paper, Treasuries | No — blacklist function exists | Yes (per issuer policy) |
| FRAX | Frax Finance (DAO) | USDC + algorithmic (FXS) backstop | Partially | No |
| USDS (Sky) | Sky Protocol (Maker rebrand) | Same as DAI, optional upgrade | Partially | No |
The key DAI advantage: No single company controls DAI. You can't freeze a DAI wallet the way Circle can freeze USDC. It's not perfect decentralization — the USDC collateral exposure creates indirect centralization risk — but DAI remains the largest decentralized stablecoin by market cap.
Real World Assets: Maker's Boldest Bet
Starting in 2022 and accelerating through 2023–24, MakerDAO made a controversial but lucrative pivot: it began parking billions of DAI's backing into real-world assets — primarily US Treasury bills and tokenized bonds. At peak, over $2 billion of the protocol's backing was in government securities earning 5%+ annual yield.
That yield flowed into two places: funding protocol operations and powering the DAI Savings Rate (DSR) — an on-chain savings account where you could deposit DAI and earn up to 8% at the peak in mid-2023. No bank account required. Just a crypto wallet and an Ethereum connection. At its peak, the DSR attracted over $1 billion in deposits from DAI holders globally.
Mostly US T-bills, tokenized via partners like MIP65 (Monetalis Clydesdale)
Earned directly in your wallet, fully on-chain, funded by RWA treasury yield
By 2023, most of Maker's income came from off-chain assets — a dramatic shift from its DeFi-native roots
The controversy: decentralized stablecoin, centralized backing?
Critics pointed out the irony: DAI, designed to be a trustless alternative to the traditional financial system, was now backed largely by US government debt. If the US Treasury froze those assets — or if Maker's custodian partners faced legal action — DAI's peg could collapse. Supporters countered that sustainable yield is worth the trade-off, and that the RWA strategy turned Maker from a loss-making protocol into one of crypto's most profitable DAOs. The Sky rebrand in 2024 (with the Endgame plan) is partly an attempt to navigate this tension — building a new decentralized structure while retaining the revenue benefits of RWA.
Risks and Considerations
USDC centralization dependency
A large portion of DAI backing is USDC, which is controlled by Circle (a US company). If Circle freezes USDC or the US government acts against it, DAI's peg could be threatened. Maker's use of RWA (including Treasuries) adds further centralization to what was designed as a trustless system.
Oracle risks
Maker relies on price oracles to know when to liquidate vaults. A manipulated or frozen oracle price could cause mass incorrect liquidations or prevent necessary liquidations. Oracle security is a critical attack surface for the entire protocol.
Governance attacks
A large MKR holder (or a coalition) could vote to steal all protocol collateral or destroy the peg. Governance security relies on no entity accumulating enough MKR to push malicious proposals through. The low voter turnout typical of on-chain governance exacerbates this risk.
Sky rebrand complexity
The transition to Sky Protocol adds complexity and potential confusion. If the community splits between MKR/DAI supporters and SKY/USDS supporters, it could fragment liquidity, reduce governance participation, and slow development of both token ecosystems.
Pros and Cons of Maker (MKR)
✅ Pros
- Battle-tested since 2017 — survived multiple market crashes
- Deflationary supply — fees burn MKR continuously
- Real protocol fees — not just speculative value, genuine revenue
- Largest decentralized stablecoin — DAI ecosystem is enormous
- Real governance weight — MKR votes have direct financial consequences
❌ Cons
- 95%+ below ATH — $6,339 peak still distant
- USDC dependency — largest DAI backer is centralized
- Sky rebrand confusion — two parallel token systems active
- Complex to understand — harder pitch for retail buyers
- Governance whale risk — few large MKR holders
Frequently Asked Questions
What is DAI and how is it different from USDC or USDT?
How does MKR get burned?
What happens if my Vault's collateral drops in value?
What is the DAI Savings Rate (DSR)?
What is the 'Sky Protocol' rebrand?
How do MKR holders govern the protocol?
What is 'Emergency Shutdown' in Maker?
Explore More DeFi Protocols
Maker created decentralized stablecoins. Explore the protocols built on top: Aave for lending, Uniswap for trading, and understand DeFi as a whole.